Ephesians 2:8-9: “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.”
There is a bizarre perception which appears to have built up that Bishop Harold Miller, the recently retired Church of Ireland Bishop of Down and Dromore, is a true ‘evangelical’.
His opposition to same-sex marriage and attendance at the supposedly conservative Anglican movement, GAFCON (Global Anglican Future Conference), seems to have been enough to see him carve out an ill-deserved reputation as an ‘evangelical’.
It would appear that by simply saying sodomites should not marry and babies ought not to be massacred in the womb you obtain such a reputation.
Certainly, it is good that anyone should hold to these views (though any Anglican cleric opposed to sodomite marriage would probably be in need of some smelling salts to revive them were anyone to use the Biblical word, ‘sodomite’ in their presence) but all it proves is they aren’t a complete reprobate.
This is a general observation we made back in January when highlighting Bishop Harold Miller’s disgraceful addressing of a Week of Prayer for Christian Unity service in Bangor.
And further evidence, were it needed, of his utterly unscriptural and dreadfully misjudged compromise with Rome has been offered in the hearty tributes paid to him by his Archbishop, the Most Ecumenical (though he, presumably, prefers Most Reverend) Richard Clarke.
Paying tribute in a statement, which is on the Church of Ireland website, Most Ecumenical Richard Clarke (pictured, above) said: “I would thank him for his wonderful contribution to the life of the Church of Ireland, both in his priestly ministry, and as Bishop of Down and Dromore over the past 22 and a half years.
“Bishop Harold has never “held back”, whether in terms of commitment, energy, enthusiasm or creativity.
“A fine liturgist and an unswerving ecumenist, he has given great service to the Church of Ireland, and for this we must indeed thank God.”
So there you go, the great ‘evangelical’ Bishop Harold Miller is in fact, as vouched for by his senior colleague, an “unswerving ecumenist”.
Certainly, given he himself is an experienced and determined compromiser with the pagan corruption of true Christianity that is Rome, Most Ecumenical Richard Clarke would know what an ecumenist looks like when he sees one.
Further evidence of this “unswerving” ecumenism can actually be seen by the second most recent post on Bishop Harold Miller’s Twitter page from 13 August, in which he has retweeted a post by the Benedictine Monks based in Rostrevor, County Down.
A brief scroll further down his Twitter page shows that on 26 March this year he congratulated a Papist monk, Mark Ephrem-Nolan, on becoming the leader of that same order of monks in Rostrevor, describing him as a “great friend and Christian brother”. The tweet is pictured, below.
How can a Romanist monk be described by any true evangelical as their “Christian brother”?
Rome and its adherents deny the Christian gospel message of salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone which the Bible teaches.
It denies that the blood of Christ is all-sufficient for salvation. This is a totally unChristian religion.
So if Bishop Harold Miller considers a Romanist monk his spiritual “brother”, one must wonder what he truly believes.
He is certainly not being faithful to God’s Word in so doing and, given evangelicals are supposed to emphasise the crucial role of Scripture, he is very clearly showing himself to be anything but an evangelical.
A true evangelical would act the evangelist when confronted with someone like Mark Ephrem-Nolan.
Agents of Rome who teach its false doctrines of salvation by works, Purgatory, Mary worship, prayers to saints, idolatry and prayers for the dead, among many others, need to be saved, they need to be evangelised.
By calling Mark Ephrem-Nolan a “Christian brother”, Bishop Harold Miller is saying that such people do not need to be evangelised.
And that, dear reader, is a Christ- dishonouring disgrace.
Bishop Harold Miller has chosen to flatter the likes of Mark Ephrem-Nolan and many other Romanists into hell rather than implore them to turn from the hellish deceits of Rome and place their faith and trust in Christ alone for salvation.
We are clearly shown in the Scriptures that salvation is not of our own works or efforts.
The verses at the top of this article are ones which Bishop Harold Miller should be quoting to the likes of Mark Ephrem-Nolan.
Here are some more from God’s inerrant and inspired Word.
Titus 3:5-7 says: “Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour; That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.”
Romans 4:16, 20-25 says: “Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all, He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God; And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform. And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness. Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.”
The righteousness of Christ is imputed, or assigned, to us by grace through faith in Him.
It doesn’t come by being raised in the church or through baptism or through paying your way or attending Mass every day or saying ‘Hail Marys’, it is by placing your faith alone in Christ.
Rome teaches that our original sin, the sinful nature we are all born with through Adam, is washed away at baptism.
This is a filthy lie.
Rome’s catechism says this: “Baptism, by imparting the life of Christ’s grace, erases original sin”.
They claim sins are cleansed by the sprinkling of water, however, sin cannot be cleansed except through the blood of Christ.
Hebrews 9:22 says that “without shedding of blood is no remission”.
Let’s repeat that – there is “no remission” to be had for sin “without shedding of blood”.
It doesn’t say that some remission can be had through other means, it doesn’t say that water can be used to clear away some sins, it says that “without shedding of blood is no remission”.
That chapter continues and puts the lie to the blasphemous continual sacrificing of Christ through the Mass.
Hebrews 9:24-26, 28: “For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.”
We are told Christ does not “offer himself often”, but rather “once… hath he appeared to put away sin by sacrifice of himself” and “Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many”.
This is repeated again and again for our clarity, yet Rome refuses to accept this crystal clear exposition of how we can be saved.
Mark Ephrem-Nolan is a promoter of this devilish doctrine, but Bishop Harold Miller, the “unswerving ecumenist”, considers him a “Christian brother”.
If this is the conservative wing of the Church of Ireland, then that truly shows the utterly apostate nature of that church.
We quite purposely omitted a verse from the close of Hebrews 9 above, and we will finish this post by highlighting it.
Hebrews 9:27 says: “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment”.
We will all die unless Christ returns first, whether we attend a Protestant church, a Roman Catholic church or follow another faith or none.
More than that, we will all be judged.
Revelation 20:11-15: “And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.”
Are you ready to meet God and be judged by Him?
Will your name be found in the book of life? Or will your name be absent and you will instead be “cast into the lake of fire”?
Hell is a real place, hell is a dreadful place, hell is forever – will you spend all eternity there or will you come to Christ for salvation?
Acts 16:31 states clearly: “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved”.
If you are saved, will you warn others who are unsaved, whether they be Roman Catholic, so-called Protestant or whatever, that they face an eternity in hell if they are not saved?
Or will you follow the example of Bishop Harold Miller and flatter those believing in a false hope of salvation into that awful place called hell?
We pray that you will be a true evangelical and seek to see poor deluded Roman Catholics saved from their false religion.
Mark 16:15: “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel”.
5 thoughts on “Great ‘evangelical’ Bishop Harold Miller praised for being ‘unswerving ecumenist’ by his Archbishop”
Thanks for these clear, helpful warnings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello Charles, thanks very much indeed for your kind words of support on this and other posts. It is, naturally, always heartening to receive such encouragement.